Independent academic research
Case study

MIT FreightLab: Where brokers have the advantage

2.3×

more likely to be accepted by brokers on historically volatile-demand lanes

The research doesn’t say “never use a broker.” On historically volatile-demand lanes, shipments were 2.3× more likely to be accepted by brokers than asset carriers, and unexpected surge shipments were roughly 2× more likely to be accepted by a broker. For consistent-demand lanes, both asset carriers and brokers had high first-tender acceptance rates.

Research credentials
Researcher
Dr. Angela “Angi” Acocella
Affiliation
MIT FreightLab / MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics
Published summary
C.H. Robinson, December 13, 2023
Dataset
Shipment transactions 2015–2021, covering dozens of shippers and thousands of contracted, backup and spot asset carriers and brokers
Dataset supplied by
TMC, a division of C.H. Robinson
Research type
Independent academic research, summarized by C.H. Robinson
Research sourceAcocella, A. (2023), summarized by C.H. RobinsonMIT FreightLab research on tender acceptance by asset carriers and brokersMIT FreightLab / MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics · dataset from TMC, a division of C.H. RobinsonIndependent academic research · 2015–2021 shipment dataView original (opens in a new tab)

This is exactly what makes the argument credible: asset carriers for predictable core freight, broker networks for volatility, exceptions and surges. Different freight belongs with different capacity models.

What it found

2.3×

Broker acceptance advantage on volatile-demand lanes

~2×

Broker acceptance advantage on unexpected surge shipments

High for both

First-tender acceptance on consistent-demand lanes, asset carriers and brokers alike

Other research and case studies

All research →
Independent academic researchMIT: Asset carriers vs. non-asset providersMIT graduate researchMIT: The cost of routing-guide failurePeer-reviewed journal articleHershey: Carrier relationships and capacity commitmentCarrier-published customer case studyNational retailer moves from non-asset providers to an asset-based modelConsultant-published client case study · ocean freightDrewry: Moving part of a network direct to carriers

How can Goldmax do this for us?

Capabilities, lane evaluation and the one-lane start.

See Goldmax direct solutions →