MIT: The cost of routing-guide failure
+9–12%
backup-carrier premium over contract; spot market +23–35%
MIT research found that average backup-carrier prices were approximately 9–12% above contract prices, depending on routing-guide depth, while average spot rates were approximately 23–35% above contract rates, depending on market conditions. A carrier’s contracted rate means less if the freight frequently gets rejected and moved deeper into the routing guide.
- Study
- Root Cause Analysis and Impact of Unplanned Procurement on Truckload Transportation Costs
- Researchers
- Nishitha Reddy Aemireddy and Xiyang Yuan
- Institution
- MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics
- Year
- 2019
- Academic advisor
- Chris Caplice, PhD
- Research type
- MIT supply-chain master’s capstone / thesis
- Data context
- Transportation-management data involving C.H. Robinson’s TMC division; tender rejection, routing-guide behavior and the cost of unplanned procurement. Listed by MIT FreightLab among its freight-rate research publications.
Additional academic support: these findings are specifically cited in Acocella, A., Caplice, C. & Sheffi, Y. (2020), Elephants or Goldfish? An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 142, Article 102073, a peer-reviewed paper that reports the 9–12% backup and 23–35% spot premiums.
The contract rate isn't always the actual cost
Contracted transportation cost
+9–12%
+23–35%
Other research and case studies
All research →How can Goldmax do this for us?
Capabilities, lane evaluation and the one-lane start.